Emerging Pensees
thoughts on God, faith, life, and the emerging church... btw, "pensees" is French for thoughts. get your mind out of the gutter ;)
about


Name: Mike Clawson
From: Austin, Texas, United States
About me: A follower of the way of Christ, a "postmodern" Christian, an amateur theologian/ philosopher, a husband, a father, a student, a friend...
More..
Contact: mike(dot)clawson
(at)gmail(dot)com


My Facebook Profile:
http://www.facebook.com/ mike.clawson1
Blog Categories
  • - atheism
  • - book reviews
  • - emerging church
  • - Emma
  • - Aidan
  • - fun
  • - personal
  • - politics
  • - social justice
  • - theology
Have a Fair Trade Christmas Yes indeed! As I've long contended, free trade and fair trade properly viewed are synonymous, as it's impossible to really have one without having the other, so I wholeheartedly endorse this approach to bringing about fair trade (as opposed to the self-destructive approach of thinking that limiting free trade will somehow make trade more fair).

However, I don't think that this group (or at least this ad) gets quite to the destination. They claim that they'll end the dependency of the world's poor, when really they just plan to change who they're depending on. As you note, they fall somewhat into the fallacy of assuming that fair trade involves paying people more than their labor is worth, which (issues of value subjectivism aside) is not a good way to end dependence long-term. While it's a useful stop-gap measure, long-term we need to rethink what we mean by value and (perhaps even more critically) institute some major land reforms. If the current fair-trade mantra is just to change the people whom the poor are dependent on, they may be making slavery more tolerable but aren't doing away with the underlying problem. Only when the massive (and in my opinion illegitimate) land monopolies are broken up will individuals really have freedom from dependence, as then they will trade only from desire rather than from necessity. Which in turn brings me back to changing our notion of value: the solution isn't to pay people more than their labor is worth, but to make sure we're paying the money to the right people: our current system is rife with government intervention granting middle-men monopoly status, to the detriment of everyone except for the governments and the middle-men: if you get free trade, you eliminate the monoplies; if you eliminate the monopolies, you get fair trade. And while the above strategy for quasi-fair trade is a good starting point due to the dismal current situation, it's not sufficient long-term since the middle-men are just going to figure out a way to up their cut.
I agree about getting rid of the middle-men, though there is still a question of what "labor" is "worth". In a purely market-driven economy the value of labor is driven entirely by supply and demand, so that someone's labor can end up of almost no value at all.

The problem with this is that the word "labor" obscures the fact that we're talking about people. Labor is not just some abstract means of production, it is real human beings. And there are those of us who believe that "labor" should therefore not be primarily tied to market-forces, but should instead be tied to what is necessary for a human being to live. Fair Trade thus seeks to address this kind of undervaluing of labor - saying that no matter what the "market" price of a commodity might be, we will choose to pay no less than a living wage to those who produced it. It's not about fixing the system, it's about refusing to exploit and take advantage of those who serve us by their labor.

As for fixing the system, that's a bigger and more complex issue, and I'm sure some of your suggestions will be helpful. However I will point out that "free trade" is somewhat of a myth. There cannot be free trade between nations when the rich countries have so many more starting advantages by which they can manipulate the system. Take farm subsidies for example. If the US signs a free trade agreement with a poorer, developing nation, there is no way that nation's agricultural industry can compete with ours, free trade or no, because we can (and do) simply drive down the prices of our commodities with massive government subsidies. "Free trade" thus just becomes an opportunity for the rich to once again gut the poor.
Good insight Mike - lots of people pay crazy premiums for brands that give them a sense of identity and self worth.

As for the poor becoming dependent on fair trade, err, aren't we all dependent on things? Better to depend on dignified work than on handouts, subsidies or fate.

Free trade is fine when nations of equal economic status enter such agreements. However, when poor countries are involved and lectured by the rich about the importance of free international markets, it is way too often a way for the rich nations to insist that the poor nations open up their fragile domestic markets to mega-farms subsidized by unethical European and US government subsidies, or to other industries that totally destroy any indigenous enterprises. Free and fair is what we need, just like in elections.
Nathan George, who is the leader of Trade As One and the voice on that video is part of Vintage Faith Church. We had a Trade As One fair a few weeks ago here and I can say that it was extremely educational. So even if the middle-man disapears as mentioned in the comment here, the fact that Trade As One is educating churches and so many people is wonderful. I am thankful we had it here and that Nathan is part of our church as it (he) has personally influenced me in ways I wouldn't have been influenced otherwise. That's cool Dan. I didn't know there was a direct connection with Trade as One with your church. Let Nathan know that his video is making an impact here in Austin as well. Our church here (Journey Imperfect Faith Community) has similarly been blessed with the presence of a few justice activists who have been able to educate the rest of the church about their causes. (For instance, have you met Shelton Green from What's Your Response? yet?) "Eye for an Eye" as an Expression of Social Justice That leads to some interesting implications for Anselmian atonement theory, which is predicated on a hierarchy of values ranging from serfs at the bottom to kings at the top of the food chain and ultimately God beyond that. Interesting. Could you say more about that Nathan? I'm not quite following your train of thought. What I'm hearing in Nathan's comment is:

A. If "An 'eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth' is not the expression of a vengeful God but a primitive statement of basic social democracy in which no [one] is held of greater worth than another, because each is created in the image of God..."

and

B. If Anselm's theory of atonement is predicated on the idea of inequality

then

C. Anselm's theory of atonement is rendered false.
Lest your good point be lost, however, as I read this I thought:

So, Jesus' teaching is like Hasidism on crack, then. Not only do we limit ourselves to "an eye for an eye" (according to Hasidic teaching) but we do one better:

"Love your enemies."
"DO to others what you would have them do to you." (vs. "DON'T do to others what you wouldn't want them to do to you").
"Bless those who curse you."

This is biblical justice: Mercy where punishment is being demanded.

See this article as I interfaced Anselm's concept of justice and mercy with the biblical concept:

http://troymarbles.blogspot.com/2005/01/how-to-create-just-society-short.html
Everyday Justice hits Amazon! LOL. Ok, I will..... :) Woohoo! So proud of you, Julie! Way to go! A much-needed book. Mike, I'm so excited for your wife and this book. Can't wait to read it! - Anna Hillary Challenges Human Trafficking There's never been an instance in history when criminalizing something lowered demand for it. Indeed, it usually just makes things worse: anti-abortion laws have given us back-alley abortions, anti-gun laws in Britain have led to an explosion in knife-related violence, anti-condom laws have given Africa an AIDS epidemic, the drug war has led to the creation of more potent and dangerous designer drugs (because they can be brewed at home instead of imported), etc.

On the other hand, in a state like Nevada with legalized prostitution, we see (some) appropriate safety measures taken and no need to resort to trafficking to continue the trade. (Although of course the Nevada model is far from perfect: regulations are written in ways which tend to benefit the brothel owners and work to protect only the health of clients rather than also protecting employees.)

What we need to do is decriminalize both the supply and the demand: legislating morality has never and will never succeed; indeed, it almost always leads to even worse "back-alley" behaviors.

And I agree completely with your view on immigration: I don't object to a quick check point to keep out terrorists and epidemics, but open borders and open immigration are the way to go.
The World Has Changed... Universal Health Care & Full Employment You'll notice that anytime unemployment drops below 5% the stock market begins to flag, because capital has begun to worry that lower unemployment will mean "wage pressure," meaning management faces a shortage in supply of labor and has to demand it, has to bid for it, pay more in competition, and wages therefore go up - and profits down.

This is a fairly widely repeated myth, but it's really not true. At the end of Clinton's second term, unemployment was down 3.1% to 4.2%, yet the stock market and economy were robust. Under Bush, unemployment has gone up and the economy is on the verge of death.

While the quoted argument makes some sense, it's definitely not a hard-and-fast rule. For that matter, having a sagging market will lead to lay-offs, so we have the market analysts dream position of being able to say the same thing with a few words changed whether the market is going up or down.

Having a strong market is good for all concerned: it ensures job stability, usually correlates with low inflation, and grows your pension fund. I agree with most of what's quoted above, but let's remember that the market isn't our enemy and that during the Great Depression, it wasn't just "Wall Street fatcats" that were getting hurt.
Miko, I haven't studied economics to know whether Robinson's assertion has any validity to it, though I'm not sure that one counter-example during the Clinton years necessarily makes it untrue. The '90s were a time of unprecedented economic growth for a whole host of reasons and thus the usual rules may not have applied. But again, I don't really know enough to argue the point.

As for your other example, re: the Bush economy, I don't think it's relevant. Just because unemployment going down often leads to a decline in the market doesn't mean that unemployment going up would lead to a strong market. Robinson's point might be that there is a kind of "sweet spot" (for businesses anyway) right around 5% where there is enough unemployment to eliminate wage pressure but not enough to hurt overall consumption.

At any rate, I don't think Robinson was arguing against having a strong market either. I think he was simply pointing out that it a system that functions best when millions of people are out of work is a flawed system.

He seems to also be implicitly questioning supply-side "trickle-down" economics and suggesting that what is good for workers and consumers will actually ultimately lead to a stronger market overall.
jaajoe - I'm not sure I'd really trust a doctor's opinion on Universal Healthcare. It seems like they have quite a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. The Irony You're a deep thinker and a good writer, Mike. I appreciate your voice. Please keep it up! But one qualm here with this post - Don't you think it's at least a little spurious to equate these two companies with Hitler and Stalin? I think you've made a good point here, but drawing a line to two of history's worst mass murderers? Really? Both Coke and China have been complicit in the mass murder still going on in Darfur, not to mention their countless other environmental and human rights crimes, so no, I don't think the analogy is too much of a stretch. Wow. Maybe I stand corrected. Thanks for your reply. Can you provide a link to more info on the Coke/Darfur situation? I'd like to know more. More here A view from the front lines Hi Mike! Look forward to seeing you at PAPA Fest. Did you hear we're working on a little (ok, not so little) movie called "The Ordinary Radicals". I have a feeling you might already have heard about it but wanted to drop you a note just in case. Check out: theordinaryradicals.com for more info, clips, pre-orders & what-nots.
See you in a couple weeks!
~jamie
Sorry Jamie, I won't be there. I'd love to go, but we have a baby due any day now and I can't get away.

Have fun anyway!
Hi there.

Have you read the book? the description on Amazon.com sounds awesome. I don't usually go for "Christian" books, but this one might change my mind.

What did you think?
I did read the book, and it was great, though I'm not quite as anabaptist in my approach to political involvement as Shane and Chris obviously are. Anyhow, I'll post a full review of it soon. The American Family Outing Hadn't heard of this - pretty impressive. Definitely makes me respect these pastors and churches for taking part. I agree with you - no matter where we stand on all this, this is a good step forward - or at least a potential step forward. Hey, I am a pastor in LA... just planted a church in LA, and came across your blog. I was raised in the homosexual community since my parents were gay... I would love to talk with you about this issue and see some of your conclusions. Let me know when you are free. Caleb, if you want to shoot me some questions feel free to email me at mike(dot)clawson(at)gmail(dot)com. However, it sounds to me like you'd have a lot more insight into those questions than I would. I'm not sure how much help I could be to you. Everything Must Change Tour Round-up Thanks for the link Mike, and good to chat with you even if it was brief. I know my friend Glenn and I are interested in helping form a cohort closer to the IL-WI border. We each host a house church and know it could include many others who arent necessarily looking for a "church change"

Great job with the conference and looking forward to more things like this in the area.
I hope you share some of your thoughts on the conference. I know you've read my thoughts already. I really did think it was good - I'm glad the message is being carried all across the US and more and more conversations are happening because of it. Good stuff. I believe... Book Review: Everything Must Change There's also this: http://www.brianmclaren.net/Faith%20and%20Action%20draft.pdf

A good way to start moving into "part three"...
The Original Illegal Immigrants What Is a Hippie? I think the term hippie is nearly useless these days. It can describe a look. It can describe a loose set of beliefs or, more likely, values. It can describe behaviors. It can carry connotations from the 60's/70's for those who remember them or can be simply reinterpreted in today's terms for people born in the 80's. And depending on the person (whether self-proclaimed hippie or outsider) that you ask, you will get a different set of criteria.

You say:

You know the stereotypes - long hair (often dreadlocked), hemp or organic or handmade clothing with lots of holes and frayed edges, facial hair, t-shirts or bumper stickers or back-pack patches with socially progressive sayings on them, etc. But it's not the image that is most important. The outward "hippie" look is really just a way of identifying that one is part of a community that cares about justice issues.

I'd say the stereotypes you list are accurate, but a little selective. If you're going to talk about stereotypes of hippies, you have to also throw in drug use (pot at a minimum, though others are also popular) and an openness toward expressing one's sexuality freely as long as nobody's being hurt (the whole free love thing).

Now of course as with any stereotype those don't apply to all hippies. Certainly not most "Christian hippies" that I know (although many of those that I know have at least dabbled with pot and some are regular users). But "Christian hippies" is a pretty small subset of hippies and they contribute little to the overall stereotype. And those things (drugs, sex without the patriarchal/societally imposed bonds of marriage) are as big a part of the overall hippie stereotype (and subculture, in my experience) as are concerns about social justice.

I'm not trying to be a finger-wagging moralist about it. Those things don't "scare" me and I have good friends who are pretty into them. But I think to be accurate the less positive aspects of the hippie stereotype have to be included, even if only to say "but that's not true of most of my hippie friends."

Amen to your last paragraph.
Perhaps I wasn't clear Karl. I wasn't trying to accurately describe people who actually are hippies. I was describing how I personally use the word. For me it's simply a slang term that I will occasionally jokingly apply to my friends in the progressive activist subculture. How I use the word has no necessary connection to the hippies of the 60's or people who might still self-identify as such today or practice that lifestyle you describe. Mike, I did note your disclaimer and see what you are getting at. I think that kind of reinforces what I said to begin my comment. No wonder people are confused when we use the term, as it can carry so many meanings. You focus on appearance and social concerns and leave off other significant elements of hippie identity (both 1960's and their present analogues), and that's fair enough, but don't be surprised if people misunderstand when you use the term. Especially when you admit that you use the term in a way you acknowledge doesn't accurately describe the actual historical or current variant of that subculture.

I can identify with your odd feeling of discomfort in hippie settings. I have a so-called white collar job and generally look pretty preppy, but many of my interests are either borderline redneck or hippie (I love the outdoors, camping, hiking, fishing, canoeing, kayaking and I'm a big college football fan) or artsy (poetry, literature, music, philosophy) - and I don't fit the "look" of either the artsy crowd or the outdoorsy crowd whether they are hippies or rednecks. I feel that odd sense of "we have a lot in common under the surface but on the surface I sure feel like I don't fit in and I bet you are making all kinds of assumptions about me based on my looks" when I'm in some of those circles but I'm not willing to adopt a different "uniform" just to fit in. When you start just interacting with people as people though, many of those barriers come down in my experience. Even if they are drug-using hippies, Bud-drinking rednecks or black-wearing artsy types. Good for you for trying to be a bridge.
Thanks Mike, for putting your thoughts out there for review and comment by total strangers. I enjoy a good discussion, especially with someone whose mind is as sharp as yours. I hope I haven't offended or come accross as too aggressive in engaging you on some of these posts.

I should have added that another place I experience that phenomenon is our local natural food co-op, where we do what we can to support local, sustainable agriculture (does that earn me points around here?). I'm definitely not hippie enough to blend in with the crowd there. But like you, unless I'm in my work clothes my wardrobe is too casual to fit in with the preppies either. I've always been a bit of a floater too. One who, within the first several months in a new setting probably has far fewer friends than the average person, but after several years in that setting actually knows far more people, from a more diverse bunch of groups, than the average person. I've never felt comfortable just choosing one clique to be "mine." I think you are right that is probably the result of a mixture of noble impulses, and commitment or other such issues.
I am glad you brought up the fact that a lot of people can be put off by the aesthetic of subcultures. It is actually a big part of why I have taken out my dreads (though I do miss them, :::tear::::). I felt like I needed to move past the phase of life where I feel like I need to communicate in a major way through my appearance.

This new perspective has been both nurtured and hindered here at Reba. It has been nurtured because all of the actual (money-sharing full commitment) members of Reba Place Fellowship are some of the most un-image-obsessed people I've ever met. They have been doing alternative community so long that they are not even aware of cultural and fashion trends, much less trying to resist them. It has been very healing to live among a lot of women, especially, who seem to be completely oblivious to the "world's" standard of beauty. These are respectable, loving, strong, caring women - it is so good to have these models around me.

My new perspective has been hindered, however, by the incredible wave of young people that are now surrounding Reba. When I came here, there were just a few other people around my age and only a couple of them looked particularly "subculture". Now there are dozens and dozens of young people, not to mention lots of college students and visitors. And most of them are very hip (though I would say not very "hippie" as there is only one person with dreads and she is not the standard) and attractive-looking. I think a lot of people easily become enamored with the "do-it-yourself" culture, which is not bad... but I do wonder if it is more driven by the aesthetic allure of it rather than by conviction.

I am trying to learn how to look more plain, though it is hard when I have tended toward finding identity in my "look." It feels silly though, when I am honest about it all. What I really want to be is a Christian. If my spirit, my words, my thoughts, my actions, are actually filled with the joy and love of Jesus... then hopefully I will no longer feel the need to express myself through how I dress. But it is an intentional and difficult journey, and I still have quite a ways to go.

Thanks for making me think, and for giving me one more little piece of encouragement to resist my own addiction to fashion (or "anti-fashion" as the case may be).

Peace to you...
Bringing Hope to Haiti Mike: I speak from personal experience when I say do not let anyone devalue the power of the hope that you will give the Haitians that you encounter. Without ever speaking the name of Christ, the love that you will surely take to the people you meet will honestly shine in their lives, and certainly God will bless the building work you all do, as well.

I have traveled three times to Siberia, each time with a mission to do some minor construction project (while building a school is something I would consider major). The "work" that I ended up doing, the real work, was literally holding orphans, playing soccer with them, hugging them, having them trounce me at ping-pong, etc. I ended up loving them, doing very little useful construction work, and having my perspective about my life here in Texas completely changed.

Each year, roughly 200 children at three orphanages on the other side of the Earth look forward to two weeks in the summertime, when they can live at forest camps and when Americans will "waste" their time and money to travel around the world to show them that they are worthy of someone's time, and that God loves them, finally.

I am excited for you and I know that your experience will bless countless Haitians, will bless you, and will finally be a blessing to everyone whose life you touch, Mike. Whatever touches your heart will come to glorify God who is sending you out, and will bless others.
Mike, good for you guys. I was scheduled to go to Haiti in 2000, but the political unrest made it too dangerous. We got sent to Panama instead. I saw so many teens alongside me going to experience GOd. I'm happy to see your right motives. Be blessed. Well said brother. And that is a great quote. I am and will be praying for you while you're down there. I also forgot to mention that I lived in the Dominican Republic for a summer - so right on the other side of the island. I lived in a very poor area and amazingly, there was a noticeable difference between the poverty of the locals, and the extreme poverty of the Haitian refugees living nearby. The Dominicans view the Haitians as an inferior race. It boggles my mind and yet feels too close to home. It seems that prejudice and social injustice exist most everywhere. I am glad that you and your team will be serving and loving amidst the brokenness. Organized Religion or Organizing Religion? Slavery Still Exists... In Your Neighborhood IJM is a great organization doing wonderful work. A local attorney quit his law firm job to go on staff with them in India a few years ago. Mike,

I couldn't agree with you more. Just last fall in my town they cracked a China Buffet restaurant that was doubling as a sex slave house. That place had been there for years and they just now found it?! I'm with you. This makes me very angry.

Thanks for the article Mike,

John
I realize I'm nitpicking, but how could Bush have signed a bill into law in 2000? Hmmm, good question Nathan. Perhaps I got that detail wrong. I think I was quoting someone else. Jesus lives next door. That was an excellent book - and your post included a great snippet.

Earlier this week, I saw a homeless guy on the corner wanting dollars and so forth. Instead of the money, I went to a Wendy's just down the street and bought a burger, fries, a Coke and a chocolate Frosty. It came to less than $5. The guy was incredibly grateful and began to get all teared up! He said, "You really took the time to do this - for ME?" Yes, it made me feel good, but that's not why I did it. I did it for the VERY reason outlined so clearly in the passage from the book: I saw "the least of these," and yes, I saw Jesus.

That book really impacted me and I recommend it to everyone; especially those involved in the Emergent Church conversation.
Welcome to Monsantoland I couldn't agree more. This has weighed heavily on my heart for many years as I have acquaintances who who work for Monsanto (and who are followers of Christ). Please pray especially for Jeff, who has a position of considerable responsibility within the company, and also for his wife. Thank you. Will do Angela... one of the things I've gleaned from various sources is that often even folks within corporations are either unaware of the things their own employers are doing, or are powerless to change them. Even CEO's who want to do good and act ethically have their hands tied by the "system" (i.e. shareholders and corporate charters that require them to maximize profits at the expense of all other considerations). I don't know whether this is the case at all with Monsanto (as we've seen with Enron, sometimes the guys at the top really are just apathetic, unethical pricks) but one can hope that there are more people like your friend Jeff within Enron that might be able to work for change.

It does raise an interesting ethical dilemma though. If a drug dealer or prostitute became a Christian wouldn't we want to encourage them to find a new profession? Wouldn't we say that their current job was contrary to following the way of Christ? What then should we say to employees of Monsanto? Is what they are doing any less unethical than these other professions? (One could actually argue that it is far worse, at least in the scope of its impact.)
The Justice Creed Mike,

Is this yours?
No, sorry, it's Brian McLaren's. I provided the link to his website in the title. I guess I forgot to attribute it. :) God delights in just laws and rejoices in just people.

Could you give some examples of some just people and some just laws?
I'm not sure what you mean Jazzy... obviously ever human attempt at justice will be but a flawed reflection of God's divine justice.

Though if you need specific examples or relatively just laws I'd say the Thirteenth amendment is a pretty good one.

Recent Reads

  • The Uses of Haiti
    by Paul Farmer




  • Putting Away Childish Things
    by Marcus Borg



  • An Unbroken Agony: Haiti, from Revolution to the Kidnapping of a President by Randall Robinson

  • Haiti in Focus: A Guide to the People, Politics, and Culture by Charles Arthur

  • Mind & Emergence: From Quantum to Consciousness
    by Philip Clayton

  • Namaah's Curse by Jacqueline Carey



  • Watchmen by Alan Moore & Dave Gibbons




Friend's Sites
  • onehandclapping
    -Julie Clawson

  • fluctuating certainty
    -Karen Gerber

  • Danno's Dangerous Mind
    -Dan Horwedel

  • T(r)oy Marbles
    -Troy Cady

  • Anglobaptist
    -Tripp Hudgins

  • The Thinkulum
    -Andy Culbertson

  • A Little Off Key
    -Amy Toornstra

  • unconventionalwisdom
    -Jen Pare

  • (Not So) Straight from Seminary
    -Brandy Daniels

  • MattTheTroll
    -Matt Cavanaugh

  • Love is the most excellent way
    -Helen Mildenhall

  • Disonanz Cognitif
    -Derek Berner

  • Wild Rumpus
    -Rebecca Murphy

  • This Just In...
    -Inouye Family

  • Discovering Pathways
    -Laurel Dixon

  • Postmodern Questions
    -Thomas Just

  • Clawson Family Blog



Classic Pensees
  • - What is the Emerging Church?
  • - The Converging Church
  • - How to Read the Bible
  • - Did the Exodus Really Happen?
  • - Hell Q&A
  • - Three Approaches to Scripture
  • - Does Forgiveness Require Repentance?
  • - Emma at the Petting Zoo
  • - Biblical Support for Women in Ministry
  • - What is Sin?
  • - What Good is the Bible?
  • - The God of Thin Places
  • - Immigration: Real Solutions
  • - What is Postmodernism?
  • - V for Vendetta
  • - What is Justice?
  • - Roots
  • - If It's Good Enough for Kids...
  • - Aslan Is Not Jesus
  • - Community Transformation
  • - Theology is Like Designing a House
  • - When I Am Weak...
  • - Why I'm Not Patriotic
  • - What is Truth?
  • - What this "postmodern" journey is all about...
  • - The Relational Nature of Sin
  • - Caught In-Between
  • - Three Routes of Escape
  • - What If God Really Existed?
  • - A Tale of Two Churches
  • - Cautions for Emergents, Part 1
  • - Cautions for Emergents, Part 2
  • - We Were There First
  • - Take NAFTA for instance...
  • - Let Them Come
  • - A New Perspective on Jesus
  • - Was Jesus Political?
  • - Contextualization or Isolation: Then and Now
  • - A Tale of Two Movements
  • - Abortion: Talking Past Each Other
  • - Epistemology or Ethics
  • - Why Faith?
  • - A Failure of Compassion
  • - Parables Aren't Always About God
  • - Do You Have a Soul?
  • - Is it all just trivial?
  • - What about the Disturbing Parts of the Bible?
  • - Into the Woods
  • - American Exceptionalism or Imperialism?
  • - Why Believe In God?
  • - Owning "Emergent"

Previous entries
  • Are Emergents Merely Liberal?
  • Liberalism, Evangelicalism and Emergence
  • The Wild Goose as a Sign of Hope
  • Blog Hiatus... Obviously
  • Review of Marcus Borg's "Putting Away Childish Thi...
  • Favorite Austin Eats
  • Busy Summer
  • Escobar on New Men and Social Change
  • Walker Cleaveland's "Brief History of Presbymergent"
  • More Conferences


Friend of Emergent Village

Join the Emergent/C Mailing List
Email:












The Gross National Debt



Locations of visitors to this page

Recommended

Julie's Book!
Events


Big Tent Christianity
Raleigh, NC
Sept 8-9


Emergent Village Theological Conversation
Atlanta, GA
Nov 1-3

Sites
  • - Emerging Women
  • - Emerging Parents
  • - Emergent Village
  • - The Ooze
  • - Next-Wave Ezine
  • - NT Wright Page
  • - Disassemblance
  • - Dylan's Lectionary Blog
  • - Mustard Seed Associates
  • - Everything Must Change
  • - Via Christus Comm. Church
  • - up/rooted
  • - Wedding Pastors USA
  • - Shieldmaiden Designs
  • - Fifty Percenters

Blogs
  • God's Politics
  • Jesus Creed
  • Friendly Atheist
  • Reclaiming the Mission
  • Emerging CGGC
  • Out of Ur
  • Theolog
  • tallskinnykiwi
  • John Armstrong
  • Paradoxology
  • Bob.Blog
  • Kingdom Grace
  • Frenetic Peace
  • Decompressing Faith
  • iamjoshbrown
  • the carnival in my head
  • Tony Jones
  • Empire Remixed
  • brianmclaren.net
  • Revolution in Jesusland
  • With/out God

Political Stuff
  • - Sojourners
  • - New Evangelical Partnership for the Common Good
  • - Progressive Christian Alliance
  • - Green Party
  • - Global Exchange
  • - The One Campaign to Make Poverty History

Books
  • A New Kind of Christianity by Brian McLaren


  • The Secret Message of Jesus by Brian McLaren



  • Velvet Elvis by Rob Bell



  • The Challenge of Jesus by N.T. Wright



  • The Gospel in a Pluralist Society by Lesslie Newbigin



  • A Generous Orthodoxy by Brian McLaren



  • Church Re-Imagined by Doug Pagitt



  • Traveling Mercies by Anne Lamott



  • Till We Have Faces by C.S. Lewis



  • Fear & Trembling by Soren Kierkegaard



  • Messy Spirituality by Mike Yaconelli



  • God's Politics by Jim Wallis



Articles
  • - What is the Emerging Church?
  • - Recommended Reading for the Emerging Church
  • - Emerging Church Resources
  • - Obama on Faith & Politics
  • - Mars Hill's Directions
  • - Profoundly Disturbed on the 4th of July
  • - 10 Key Values of the Green Party
  • - NT Wright on Penal Substitution
  • - Walter Wink on The Myth of Redemptive Violence
  • - Mark Twain's War Prayer
  • - Rebuttals to Richard Dawkins
  • - Day in the Life of Joe Middle-Class Republican

Music

  • U2 - How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb



  • Green Day - American Idiot



  • David Wilcox - Into the Mystery



  • Caedmon's Call - Share the Well



  • Passion: Hymns Ancient and Modern



  • Jake Armerding




  • Tourniquet - Vanishing Lessons


Viewing

  • The Lord of the Rings



  • Star Wars Trilogy



  • Fight Club



  • Garden State



  • Saved!



  • Joan of Arcadia




  • Magnolia



  • Donnie Darko



  • High Fidelity



  • The Mission



  • Futurama



  • The Simpsons


Emerging Churches
  • Mosaic - Los Angeles, CA

  • Vintage Faith Church - Santa Cruz, CA

  • Church of Jesus Christ, Reconciler - Chicago, IL

  • Wicker Park Grace - Chicago, IL

  • The Emmaus Community - Chicago Heights, IL

  • Fusion Church - Lake Zurich, IL

  • Life on the Vine - Long Grove, IL

  • Mars Hill - Grandville, MI

  • Waters Edge - Hudsonville, MI

  • Threads Church - Kalamazoo, MI

  • Solomon's Porch - Minneapolis, MN

  • Oasis Madrid - Madrid, Spain

  • Mosaic - Austin, TX

  • Vineyard Community Church - Shoreline, WA

Sunday, November 29, 2009
Have a Fair Trade Christmas
For the past few weeks our church here in Austin has been using the following video from Trade as One to encourage us to buy Fair Trade this Christmas season. (Which is one of the reasons I love our church here.)



The great thing about this is that it uses the system itself to work for justice. While undermining our consumer capitalist world-system may ultimately be necessary, it's not replaceable overnight, and those of us who are still going to shop for Christmas presents and still need to buy other things from time to time as well need ways that we can make a difference even within this system. So if you're going to shop, buy Fair Trade wherever and whenever possible.

BTW, for some reason as I watch this video, I keep thinking of one of the most ridiculous arguments against Fair Trade that I've ever heard, which is that Fair Trade won't work because it asks people to pay more for no tangible benefit to themselves except the "Fair Trade" label, and the warm fuzzy feelings they get from helping others. And yet we consumers choose to pay more all the time for even more ridiculous intangible benefits like designer labels, brand names, etc. and the warm, fuzzy feelings they get from being "hip" and "stylish" (even when you can buy something that looks exactly the same for a fraction of the price at the discount store down the road). If people can be induced to make purchase decisions for these sorts of silly reasons, why can't we hope that people can also be persuaded to choose Fair Trade items for much better reasons. And why not let it start with you and me this holiday season?

Labels: Fair Trade, social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 4:05 PM | Permalink | 5 comments
Monday, April 20, 2009
"Eye for an Eye" as an Expression of Social Justice
I found this interpretation unique and compelling:
What is unique in the Hasidic approach to reconciliation is that it points the way to seeing justice and love as necessary complements of each other rather than as alternatives between which one must choose... The large majority of people in our culture hold the distorted view that the God of the Old Testament is a harsh and wrathful God in contrast to the loving and merciful God of the New... An "eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" is not the expression of a vengeful God but a primitive statement of basic social democracy in which no [one] is held of greater worth than another, because each is created in the image of God... Throughout all history, indeed, the natural inequality of man has justified razing a whole city to revenge the murder of one privileged man. Countless others have been exterminated with impunity because they were slaves or serfs or members of an "inferior race." "An eye for an eye" is a fundamental conception of social justice.

~ Maurice Friedman, "Hasidism and the love of enemies" in Peace is the Way

Labels: social justice, theology

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 9:58 AM | Permalink | 4 comments
Friday, April 17, 2009
Everyday Justice hits Amazon!
Everyday Justice, Julie's book that she's been working on for the past year and a half is finally up on Amazon.com, and available for pre-order. You can also read some blurbs about it at the publisher's page for it.

As Julie describes the book:
The book, as the title implies, is about justice - about the ways each of us can live into the way of life Jesus calls us to live. I think too often we get overwhelmed by justice issues and decide that they are just for the Mother Teresas or the Shane Claibornes of the world to care about. So this book is about the ways each of us in our simple everyday lives can act justly. In it I explore the ways that we can love our neighbors through what we eat, wear, drive, and consume. But the book isn’t just a list of do’s and don’ts, but an exploration of what it means to love our neighbor. It explores what it means not only to pursue justice with our day to day actions, but also how we can avoid supporting systems of injustice with those actions as well.
I'm so proud and excited for my wife, and I can't wait till the book is available for y'all to read as well. You'd better go ahead and add it to your Amazon Wish List right now so you don't forget. :)

Labels: Everyday Justice, Julie, social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 1:54 PM | Permalink | 3 comments
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Hillary Challenges Human Trafficking
I was thrilled to read this comment from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during her confirmation hearings:

As Secretary of State I view these issues (human trafficking) as central to our foreign policy, not as adjunct or auxiliary or in any way lesser from all of the other issues that we have to confront. I too have followed the stories: this is not culture, this is not custom, this is criminal … I’ve also read closely Nick Kristof’s articles over the last many months on the young women he’s both rescued from prostitution and met who have been enslaved, tortured in every way: physically, emotionally, morally and I take very seriously the function of the State Department to lead the U.S. Government through the Office on Human Trafficking to do all that we can to end this modern form of slavery. We have sex slavery. We have wage slavery and it is primarily a slavery of girls and women.

I hope she follows through on this pledge. I also hope she realizes the impact that our immigration policies and prostitution laws have on the inability of trafficked women to seek help. As Jim Wallis suggests, we need to criminalize buying sex while decriminalizing selling sex, so as to dry up the demand without punishing the victims. We also need to stop prosecuting women who have been trafficked into this country for being "illegal immigrants". (Actually, I think we need to get rid of the whole concept of "illegal" immigration altogether by opening our borders, but I've already written about that.)

Labels: politics, social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 12:11 PM | Permalink | 1 comments
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
The World Has Changed...
There were just so many inspirational lines in Obama's speech today, and I'll probably want to comment on more of them eventually. However, I was especially excited about this one:
To the people of poor nations, we pledge to work alongside you to make your farms flourish and let clean waters flow; to nourish starved bodies and feed hungry minds. And to those nations like ours that enjoy relative plenty, we say we can no longer afford indifference to suffering outside our borders; nor can we consume the world's resources without regard to effect. For the world has changed, and we must change with it.

Amen!

Labels: Obama, social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 5:11 PM | Permalink | 0 comments
Sunday, July 06, 2008
Universal Health Care & Full Employment
As our economy spirals further and further down the tubes I found these suggestions from Kim Stanley Robinson's book, Sixty Days and Counting, provocative and found myself wondering whether we could ever actually elect leaders with the courage and vision to enact them. This is from another one of his fictional "Cut to the Chase" presidential blog entries:

I've been remembering the fear I had. It's made me think about how a lot of people in this world have to live with a lot of fear every day. Not acute fear maybe, but chronic, and big. Of course we all live with fear, you can't avoid it. But still, to be afraid for your kids. To be afraid of getting sick because you don't have health care. That fear itself makes you sick. That's fifty million people in our country. That's a fear we could remove. It seems to me now that government of the people, by the people, and for the people should be removing all the fears that we can. There will always be basic fears we can't remove - fear of death, fear of loss - but we can do better on removing the fear of destitution, and our fear for our kids and the world they'll inherit.

One way we could do that would be to guarantee health insurance. Make it a simple system, like Canada's or Holland's or Denmark's, and make sure everyone has it. That's well within our ability to fund. All the healthiest countries do it that way. Let's admit the free market botched this and we need to put our house in order. Health shouldn't be something that can bankrupt you. It's not a market commodity. Admitting that and moving on would remove one of the greatest fears of all.

Another thing we could do would be to institute full employment. Government of the people, by the people, and for the people could offer jobs to everyone who wants one. It would be like the Works Progress Administration during the Depression, only more wide-ranging. Because there's an awful lot of work that needs doing, and we've got the resources to get things started. We could do it.

One of the more interesting aspects of full employment as an idea is how quickly it reveals the fear that lies at the heart of our current system. You'll notice that anytime unemployment drops below 5% the stock market begins to flag, because capital has begun to worry that lower unemployment will mean "wage pressure," meaning management faces a shortage in supply of labor and has to demand it, has to bid for it, pay more in competition, and wages therefore go up - and profits down.

Think for a minute about what that means about the system we've agreed to live in. Five percent of our working population is about ten million people. Ten million people out of jobs, and a lot of them therefore homeless and without health insurance. Destitute and hungry. But this is structural, it's part of the plan. We can't hire them without big businesses getting scared at the prospect that they might have to compete for labor by offering higher wages and more benefits. So unemployment never dips below 5% without having a chilling effect on the market, which depresses new investments and new hiring, and as a result the unemployment rate goes back up. No one has to say anything - it works as if by itself - but the fear keeps being created and profits stay high. People stay hungry and compliant.

So essentially, by these attitudes and responses, big business and stock owners act as a cartel to keep the economy cranking along at a high rate but with unemployment included as an element, so that the bottom wage earners are immiserated and desperate, and the rest of the wage earners will take any job they can get, at any wages, even below a living wage, because that's so much better than nothing. And so all wage earners and most salary earners are kept under the thumb of capital, and have no leverage to better their deal in the system.

But if government of the people, by the people, and for the people were offering all citizens employment at a real living wage, then private business would have to match that or they wouldn't be able to get any labor. Supply and demand, baby - and so the bids for labor would get competitive, as they say. That all by itself would raise the income and living standards for about 70 percent of our population faster than any other single move I could think of. The biggest blessing would be for the lowest 30 percent or so - what's that, a hundred million people? Or could we just say, working America? Or just America?

Of course it's a global labor market, and so we would need other countries to enact similar programs, but we could work on that. We could take the lead and exert America's usual heavyweight influence. We could put the arm on countries not in compliance, by keeping out investment capital and so on. Globalization has gotten far enough along that the tools are there to leverage the whole system in various ways. You could leverage it toward justice just as easily as toward extraction and exploitation. In fact it would be easier, because people would like it and support it. I think it's worth a try.

Labels: politics, social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 10:27 AM | Permalink | 3 comments
Thursday, July 03, 2008
The Irony
The Chicago Tribune today had an article about how corporate sponsors of the Beijing Olympics are nervous about the negative reaction they may get from those who are protesting the games because of China's numerous human rights abuses. Many protestors are calling on sponsors like Coca-Cola and McDonalds to condemn these Chinese policies.

I was struck by the irony of this considering that many of these corporations are themselves culprits of similar crimes. Why would they make a big deal about China's human rights abuses when they're guilty of their own? Asking Coke or McDonalds to condemn China for human rights abuses is like asking Hitler to condemn Stalin for genocide.

Labels: social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 12:44 PM | Permalink | 4 comments
Thursday, June 05, 2008
A view from the front lines
From Shane Claiborne and Chris Haw's new book, Jesus for President:

The other night a soldier called us on the phone (not that unusual these days). He said that he and his friend had just gotten back from Iraq, where a bunch of folks were passing around a copy of the book The Irresistible Revolution. His friend had been in a shooting conflict with some Iraqis, and he shot an older man. Now this twenty-year-old American soldier was having a hard time sleeping. But it wasn't the fact that he had killed the man that was keeping him up at night. It was the face of the man's son, a twelve-year-old boy, who had run out of the house, grabbed his dead father's gun, and started shooting at the US soldiers. So the soldier's friend shot the boy too.

What else could he have done? The soldier said it's absolutely maddening; people feel like they are turning into animals. And every time they point a gun in some young kid's face, they feel they're creating a terrorist. He said that our guns and wars are not making the world safer.

Labels: politics, Shane Claiborne, social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 5:51 PM | Permalink | 4 comments
Thursday, April 24, 2008
The American Family Outing

An amazing thing is happening. Some of the nation's most influential megachurch pastors will actually be sitting down with LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender) families and their supporters to talk about mutual understanding and reconciliation. Soulforce, an organization that we've supported in the past, is sponsoring the American Family Outing during this these next two months. According to their website:
Between Mother's Day Weekend and Father's Day Weekend, 2008, diverse families from around the country will create meaningful conversations about faith, family, and LGBT people. We seek first to understand, and then to be understood, as we engage the families at six of America's leading mega-churches. We visit these churches because we recognize the enormous influence each has within Christianity and the larger culture, through ministries, radio and television programs, and books that reach millions. We believe these churches have the potential to be a positive force in ending the physical and spiritual violence perpetuated by some religious voices against LGBT people and their families. Some of these churches have exercised inspirational leadership on social issues such as poverty and AIDS, and we believe they can exercise comparable, courageous leadership in ending spiritual and physical violence against LGBT people.

Regardless of one's opinion of whether or not homosexuality is "sinful", I would hope that all Christians could agree that we should be in favor of ending physical and spiritual violence against LGBT people. (I know this will not actually be the case, but one can hope.) I commend the six pastors participating in this for having the courage to engage in this dialogue. I can guarantee that they will take a lot of flak within the evangelical community for even agreeing to do this, and I hope they can each find ways to create healthy dialogue and not just an argument. Imagine what could happen if these well-known leaders can set a new tone for how evangelical Christians engage with LGBT people.

The six pastors and churches are:
  • Joel Osteen of Lakewood Church in Houston, TX
  • Bishop T.D. Jakes of The Potter's House in Dallas, TX
  • Bishop Harry Jackson, Jr. of Hope Christian Church near Washington D.C.
  • Bishop Eddie Long of New Birth Missionary Baptist Church near Atlanta, GA
  • Bill Hybels of Willow Creek Community Church near Chicago, IL
  • Rick Warren of Saddleback Community Church in Orange County, CA
Click here to find out how you can be involved.

Labels: social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 6:37 PM | Permalink | 3 comments
Monday, April 07, 2008
Everything Must Change Tour Round-up
I spent this past weekend helping to coordinate the Everything Must Change Tour in Chicago. I love doing this sort of thing, helping plans come together and networking with new and old friends. Of course I've gotten very little sleep, spent yesterday mostly recovering from the event (I think I'm coming down with something), and today I have to get caught up on work that was put off for the conference, so I probably won't post a full recap of the event until tomorrow. In the meantime here are some articles and reviews on other blogs that you should check out if you're curious:

First an article written just before the conference in Oak Park's Wednesday Journal that I was interviewed for. I got to meet the author, Tom Holmes, briefly at the conference.

As usual Helen has a great play-by-play review of the conference. (And she gets the credit for the picture above. I forgot to bring my camera.)

Also check out some of Jason's raw notes on the sessions.

Chad Farrand, leader of the Mid-Michigan cohort whom I met for the first time this weekend, has a good recap of his experience as well.

And for a totally unique, very personal take in her usual "wonderfully rambling" style, check out my friend Rebecca's posts.

Also, regardless of whether you were there, you can contribute to this revolution and share ideas about how to bring real change over at the Everything Must Change web community.

And if you live near Seattle, Kansas City, Goshen IN, or New York City it's not too late to sign up to attend the Tour yourself.

Labels: Brian McLaren, conferences, emerging church, social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 12:36 PM | Permalink | 2 comments
Monday, January 21, 2008
I believe...
An excerpt from Martin Luther King Jr.'s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech, given December 10, 1964 in Oslo Norway:

I accept this award today with an abiding faith in America and an audacious faith in the future of mankind. I refuse to accept despair as the final response to the ambiguities of history. I refuse to accept the idea that the "isness" of man's present nature makes him morally incapable of reaching up for the eternal "oughtness" that forever confronts him.

I refuse to accept the idea that man is mere flotsom and jetsom in the river of life unable to influence the unfolding events which surround him. I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality.

I refuse to accept the cynical notion that nation after nation must spiral down a militaristic stairway into the hell of thermonuclear destruction. I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in reality. This is why right temporarily defeated is stronger than evil triumphant.

I believe that even amid today's motor bursts and whining bullets, there is still hope for a brighter tomorrow. I believe that wounded justice, lying prostrate on the blood-flowing streets of our nations, can be lifted from this dust of shame to reign supreme among the children of men.

I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their minds, and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits. I believe that what self-centered men have torn down, men other-centered can build up. I still believe that one day mankind will bow before the altars of God and be crowned triumphant over war and bloodshed, and nonviolent redemptive goodwill will proclaim the rule of the land.

"And the lion and the lamb shall lie down together and every man shall sit under his own vine and fig tree and none shall be afraid."

I still believe that we shall overcome.


Click here for the entire address.

Labels: Martin Luther King Jr., social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 11:36 AM | Permalink | 0 comments
Monday, December 17, 2007
Book Review: Everything Must Change
Last month I read Brian McLaren's latest book, Everything Must Change: Jesus, Global Crises, and a Revolution of Hope. Now, it's no secret that I'm a big fan of pretty much everything Brian has written so far, and this book is no different. In my opinion it is an excellent diagnosis of the problems facing our world today, as well as a brilliant application of the message of Jesus to these issues - demonstrating that the gospel is just as radically subversive today as it was 2000 years ago.

Of course, as he did in he previous book, The Secret Message of Jesus (to which this book ought to be considered a sequel), Brian is arguing that the gospel message of Jesus has broader implications than simply where we go when we die (what Brian describes as the "conventional view"). However, Brian doesn't wholly reject the conventional view. I've pointed out before that Brian has reaffirmed that he still believes in "the need for saving faith, for forgiveness, for hope beyond death, for the pursuit of orthodox articulations of belief, for overcoming the damning effects of sin, for rejecting wholeheartedly the idea that we can be saved by our own efforts or through religion, and so on." However, Brian suggests that either this is not the main point of Jesus message, or at least is only part of the total picture. Instead he suggests an "emerging view" which sees the gospel as a message of hope for the whole world, both before and after death, with a goal of seeing God's will being done on earth as it is in heaven. In this view Jesus didn't just come to save us from the "legal" consequences of our sin (i.e. punishment in Hell after we die), but from sin itself - i.e. from the destructive consequences of human evil and injustices in this world. As Brian says,
"Through [Jesus'] life and teaching, through his suffering, death, and resurrection, he inserted into human history a seed of grace, truth, and hope that can never be defeated. This seed will, against all opposition and odds, prevail over the evil and injustice of humanity and lead to the world's ongoing transformation into the world God dreams of." (pp. 79-80)

Furthermore, Brian suggests that we can have a role to play in this transformation. He goes on to say:
"All who find in Jesus God's hope and truth discover the privilege of participating in his ongoing work of personal and global transformation and liberation from evil and injustice. As part of his transforming community, they experience liberation from the fear of death and condemnation. This is not something they earn or achieve, but rather a free gift they receive as an expression of God's grace and love." (p. 80)

However, Brian's main point in this book is not simply to critique conventional views of the gospel. Instead he suggests that this more robust, emerging view provides a "framing story" (akin to a worldview or metanarrative, but without the negative or totalizing connotations) that has the power to challenge the destructive framing stories which have led to the numerous crises facing our world today. After surveying several lists of the top global crises (e.g. the UN Millenium Development Goals, the Copenhagen Consensus, Rick Warren's PEACE Plan, etc., which list things like extreme poverty and hunger, disease, lack of education, war and violence, environmental degradation, and global warming, among other problems. Brian suggests boiling these issues down into three interlocking societal "systems" of Prosperity, Security, and Equity, which he says have become dysfunctional and even "suicidal". Most of the rest of the book fleshes out the different ways these systems have become dysfunctional. (Most of Brian's discussion can be boiled down to the diagram below.)


A common criticism of the book I have read so far is that Brian doesn't provide much in the way of specific, pragmatic solutions to these problems. However, I think that critique misunderstands the purpose of the book. Brian's first concern is in regards to our framing stories. He suggests that the solution to all of these problems is ultimately a spiritual one - that is, what we need first and foremost is a new vision for how the world could be, i.e. a new framing story - and that is what the majority of the book is spent addressing. In terms of the diagram above, the central wheel, the one that turns all the others, is our framing story, and if that is off, then the whole machine will be off. This book is about the ways in which Jesus' message can provide a framing story that will enable the machine to function in the way it was intended to.

That being said, I was personally wishing for a few more practical suggestions as well. My hope is that Brian will come back to this in an upcoming book (as he tantalizingly hints at in one of his many footnotes). Perhaps he can complete this current "trilogy" with the "so what do we do now?" book; though when I was talking with him recently about his upcoming Everything Must Change Tour, he expressed his hope that the Tour would be the place where those practical discussions could start. And perhaps that is better in the long run. If everything really is going to change, it's going to have to happen in the context of relationships, conversations, and communities committing together for practical action; not just by reading one more book. Hopefully this current book will simply serve as a catalyst to actually get people in motion.

BTW, for far more in-depth discussion of the book, I'd highly recommend checking out the recent "Must Everything Change" series on Scot McKnight's blog.

Labels: Brian McLaren, emerging church, social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 5:30 PM | Permalink | 1 comments
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
The Original Illegal Immigrants
Rev. Randy Woodley, a Keetoowah Cherokee Indian teacher, lecturer, poet, activist, pastor, and author, had an excellent article over at the God's Politics blog a few days ago regarding illegal immigration. Naturally the issue looks a little different to the original inhabitants of this country. He writes:
Concern about illegal immigrants has a familiar ring to us Native Americans. We have been empathizing with those concerns for over half a millennium.

Let's see ...Were the first immigrants to America illegal? By every definition - yes! But perhaps if they had a good reason it makes their trespass less offensive. What of their motives? The stated intent of some of the earliest European settlers in America was first to establish military superiority over the inhabitants and then "civilize" them by assimilating them into their form of government and converting them to a foreign religion. Such was the case in the earliest American colonies: From the First Charter of Virginia, April 10, 1606..."[we] may in time bring the Infidels and Savages, living in those parts, to human Civility, and to a settled and quiet Government."

And talk about attitude ... they even came expecting us to learn their language. For example, I always thought, if you come to Cherokee country, you should speak Cherokee.
He goes on to describe the ways early American Christians even used their faith as justification for the subjugation and eradication of Native Americans, and wraps up with this summary:

Early American immigrants, now well established, may have conveniently forgotten that their ancestors did not come as law-abiding citizens, but were intent on making their own laws and disregarding any laws already established by the original Americans. They often justified the taking of innocent lives and the removal of the original inhabitants by their religion. I could go on ... believe me ... I could go on. Suffice it to say, when I look at the track record of the current immigrants compared to the first immigrants, I find much hope for the future of our country.
Yes indeed. Let's be thankful that today's illegal immigrants are here merely to work and live, and not to violently take our land and lives from us, as our own illegal immigrant ancestors did to Randy's people.

Read the rest of Randy's article here.

Tags: illegal immigration, God's Politics, Native Americans, Randy Woodley

Labels: immigration, politics, social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 1:24 PM | Permalink | 0 comments
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
What Is a Hippie?
Last night at up/rooted I got to see an old friend, Tatiana, and her husband Chico. They are a fun and unique couple who live in an intentional Mennonite community near Chicago called Reba Place Fellowship. At one point in the conversation I playfully told Tatiana that she and Chico were "hippies", and proceeded to try and explain what I meant by that and why it was a compliment in my book. I don't think I did a very good job of it though, so I wanted to take another stab at it here. Keep in mind that I am not at all attempting a historically accurate definition; I am merely describing how I personally use the word.

To me a hippie is someone who, like myself, cares about issues of social justice - things like care for the environment, concern for the poor, and non-violence/peacemaking. However, unlike myself, a hippie is someone who also looks the part. That is, they are immersed in a sub-culture of like-minded people who tend to dress and present themselves in ways that reflect their values. You know the stereotypes - long hair (often dreadlocked), hemp or organic or handmade clothing with lots of holes and frayed edges, facial hair, t-shirts or bumper stickers or back-pack patches with socially progressive sayings on them, etc.

But it's not the image that is most important. The outward "hippie" look is really just a way of identifying that one is part of a community that cares about justice issues. And in fact much of the look has thoughtful rationale behind it. For instance, "hippies" are often concerned about where their clothes come from - whether they were made ethically and in environmentally friendly ways - so their clothes will tend to look different than what you'd typically find at Wal-Mart or the Banana Republic. Beyond that, hippies also tends to dress in a way that expresses themselves and reflects the community they are a part of.

Sadly, while I've always wanted to be able to pull off that look, I've never been a part of a community like that, where that image is the norm. And truthfully, it's just not me. I care about all those same issues, but I've never felt compelled to fit into the hippie, activist "look" myself. I think if I did, I would just be posing. It wouldn't be true to myself, or the community I am currently a part of.

And that, to me, is the both the attraction and the danger of being a "hippie", IMHO. I've long wanted to be part of a community like that, where I am surrounded by others who all share my same passions. I think it'd be great to live in the kind of community that Chico and Tatiana are a part of (though the introverted side of me does get a little freaked out by the idea). However, the danger is that truthfully the image can sometimes become a barrier to others who perhaps care about the issues but feel like an unwelcome "outsider" if they don't fit the look. It can honestly be intimidating for a typical suburbanite to join a group of dread-locked, hemp clad "hippies" and wonder whether we are being judged based on our more conventional attire - in the same way that hippies and others who dress in "alternative" styles are themselves very often judged by folks in mainstream society for their appearance.

I know this may all seem trivial, but this is the way society works. Wrong though it may be, we human beings do tend to judge books by their covers and exclude or welcome people based on appearances. So while I'd love to be able to fit into the hippie/activist sub-culture, I also want to be able to be a bridge to people who aren't part of that and let them know that it's okay for suburbanites to care about justice issues too. Because ultimately it's going to take all types if we really want to change the world.

Tags: hippies, Reba Place Fellowship, social justice

Labels: social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 8:24 PM | Permalink | 5 comments
Monday, November 12, 2007
Bringing Hope to Haiti
I'm leaving for Haiti today. I'll be there for a week building a school in the small mountain village of Marfranc outside the port city of Jeremie on the far end of Haiti's southern peninsula. I'm going with six other people through New Life for Haiti, the non-profit development organization started by our parent church, LifeSpring Community Church in Plainfield, IL. It will be my first time in an actual Third World country (Haiti is the poorest nation in the Western Hemisphere, and possibly in the entire world) and I can't wait. It will certainly be a lot of hard work, but I am eager to be down there, to serve, and to get to know some of the Haitian people.



Some have asked my why we're going to build a school. Why spend the money to send a bunch of Americans down there to do the work? Why not just send the money and pay the Haitians to do it themselves? What good do we add to the equation?

That's a good question, and I am definitely all for empowering native peoples to lift themselves out of poverty. However, I think there is value in my being there as well. Brian McLaren actually tells a story in Everything Must Change that I think expresses it well. He tells of a family in Argentina that adopted a small Indian village up in the mountains and decided to help them build a school for themselves. Brian asked the mother of this family, Graciela, a similar question "Why? Why didn't the people try to build a school before?" Then he gives us Graciela's answer:

"The people had no hope. When people have no hope, all they think about is scraping by for one more day. There is no tomorrow, there is no creativity, there is no will to organize, people can't even think straight, because they have no hope... we weren't there just to help them as some superior people helping inferiors. No, we were there because we genuinely loved them - no, not just that - we liked them... It wasn't the resources we brought that made a difference. It was our presence. We were simply among them as people with hope, among them as people with love, and that made the difference. They caught our hope."

That is why I'm going to Haiti. Not as a great white savior, but simply as a bearer of hope.

Tags: Haiti, New Life for Haiti, LifeSpring, Brian McLaren, Everything Must Change, hope

Labels: Brian McLaren, personal, social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 12:30 AM | Permalink | 4 comments
Sunday, November 11, 2007
Organized Religion or Organizing Religion?
I've just finished reading Brian McLaren's latest book, Everything Must Change: Jesus, Global Crises, and a Revolution of Hope. There are so many things I want to blog about related to it, but I don't have the time, so for now I'll just post a quote that I especially liked.

The hard work of rebuilding community and family is essential - through community organizing, through moral instruction in local churches, through support for women and children through community centers and health clinics and schools, through micro-enterprise projects and drug rehabilitation programs to help people develop employment or become employable.

In my travels, whether in the inner cities of the United States or in slums around the world, the vast majority of these programs are overtly or implicitly faith-based, often drawing inspiration from Jesus’ good news of the kingdom of God. For all the obvious failures of “organized religion,” in these organizations I see the power of organizing religion… people of faith organizing for something truly beautiful and good. As they promote a vision for the common good resourced by Jesus’ good news of the kingdom of God, they promote the seven components of equity: trade with integrity (both free and fair), wise aid, wise debt relief, respect for environmental limits in terms of both resource consumption and population growth, fair wages, the development of justice systems, and community and family development.

If there is a force in the world powerful and good enough to overcome the grinding, destructive momentum of the suicide machine [his term for our currently corrupt and unsustainable global systems of prosperity, security and equity], it is to be found, not in organized religion seeking institutional self-preservation, but in religion organizing for the common good.
Tags: Brian McLaren, Everything Must Change, organized religion

Labels: Brian McLaren, social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 10:41 PM | Permalink | 0 comments
Tuesday, November 06, 2007
Slavery Still Exists... In Your Neighborhood
Over 10,000 young girls (and sometimes boys) are brought into the United States every year to be sold as sex slaves, according to this 2004 NY Times article. Be forewarned before you click, the stories in this article are horrendous. It makes me unbelievably angry to read about the injustices done to these girls, often right out in plain sight.

What I can't fathom is the fact that this information is so easily found - it can't really be hidden after all; the men who pay for sex with these girls have to be able to find them - and yet no one does anything. Over and over again the article spoke of corrupt local officials in the countries of origin, or oblivious and under-resourced law enforcement here in the United States who would deny that human trafficking was a real problem, and, when they did take action, would often prosecute the girls themselves as prostitutes or illegal aliens. (Despite the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act passed by President Bush in 2000.)

And who are the men paying for these women? Do they even know what they are doing, that the women they are paying to have sex with are really slaves, kidnapped and taken from their own homes and families, or is the true nature of the crime hidden even from the customers? Regardless, if so many people are being trafficked, that means there must be a huge demand for it. Which means that tens of thousands of men, ordinary people who live in neighborhoods like yours and mine, must be seeking this kind of thing out.

And sometimes these girls are even kept in our own neighborhoods. The article described how most of the houses where girls are kept are in ordinary, middle-class neighborhoods. In a society where we keep to ourselves and don't bother to know our neighbors, this kind of things goes on right under our noses.

As just one example, here is just one story from this 11-page article:
The house at 1212 1/2 West Front Street in Plainfield, N.J., is a conventional midcentury home with slate-gray siding, white trim and Victorian lines. When I stood in front of it on a breezy day in October, I could hear the cries of children from the playground of an elementary school around the corner. American flags fluttered from porches and windows. The neighborhood is a leafy, middle-class Anytown. The house is set back off the street, near two convenience stores and a gift shop. On the door of Superior Supermarket was pasted a sign issued by the Plainfield police: ''Safe neighborhoods save lives.'' The store's manager, who refused to tell me his name, said he never noticed anything unusual about the house, and never heard anything. But David Miranda, the young man behind the counter of Westside Convenience, told me he saw girls from the house roughly once a week. ''They came in to buy candy and soda, then went back to the house,'' he said. The same girls rarely came twice, and they were all very young, Miranda said. They never asked for anything beyond what they were purchasing; they certainly never asked for help. Cars drove up to the house all day; nice cars, all kinds of cars. Dozens of men came and went. ''But no one here knew what was really going on,'' Miranda said. And no one ever asked.

On a tip, the Plainfield police raided the house in February 2002, expecting to find illegal aliens working an underground brothel. What the police found were four girls between the ages of 14 and 17. They were all Mexican nationals without documentation. But they weren't prostitutes; they were sex slaves. The distinction is important: these girls weren't working for profit or a paycheck. They were captives to the traffickers and keepers who controlled their every move. ''I consider myself hardened,'' Mark J. Kelly, now a special agent with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (the largest investigative arm of the Department of Homeland Security), told me recently. ''I spent time in the Marine Corps. But seeing some of the stuff I saw, then heard about, from those girls was a difficult, eye-opening experience.''

The police found a squalid, land-based equivalent of a 19th-century slave ship, with rancid, doorless bathrooms; bare, putrid mattresses; and a stash of penicillin, ''morning after'' pills and misoprostol, an antiulcer medication that can induce abortion. The girls were pale, exhausted and malnourished.

It turned out that 1212 1/2 West Front Street was one of what law-enforcement officials say are dozens of active stash houses and apartments in the New York metropolitan area -- mirroring hundreds more in other major cities like Los Angeles, Atlanta and Chicago -- where under-age girls and young women from dozens of countries are trafficked and held captive. Most of them -- whether they started out in Eastern Europe or Latin America -- are taken to the United States through Mexico. Some of them have been baited by promises of legitimate jobs and a better life in America; many have been abducted; others have been bought from or abandoned by their impoverished families.

I can't tell you how enraged all this makes me. What would it take to get our law enforcement officials to step up to the plate and crack down on this sort of thing - in a way that punishes the slave traders and not the girls themselves, indeed, in a way that helps the girls and restores a new life to them? What would it take to end the corruption in those foreign countries and stop the trafficking before it even starts? And whatever it takes, isn't it worth it? If this was your daughter, or sister, or friend, wouldn't you do whatever it took to rescue her?

Fortunately there are a number of organizations dedicated to rescuing these girls. My favorite is International Justice Mission, a Christian organization run by Gary Haugen, but there are many others as well. The Not For Sale Campaign is a coalition of the many smaller groups that have been working to fight this problem for many years. The website lists many ways to get involved in fighting sex trafficking and the global international slave trade.

Let's stop human trafficking NOW!

Tags: slavery, sex slaves, human trafficking, International Justice Mission, Not For Sale, Gary Haugen, Slavery Still Exists

Labels: social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 10:58 AM | Permalink | 4 comments
Thursday, November 01, 2007
Jesus lives next door.
This is from a "Meditation" section by Claudia Mair Burney in Will & Lisa Samson's book, Justice in the Burbs:

Jesus lives next door. He's an eight-year-old girl and her three-year-old brother. The Son of Man looks like those starving Ethiopian children. He only gets breakfast and lunch at school, when he makes it. His mama is a crack whore. Nobody knows where his daddy is. I heard his mama lets her "Johns" do things to him.
Poor King of Kings.

Jesus is two houses down and has six children. Now he's pregnant with the seventh. I don't know if he hasn't figured out what birth control is, or what, but how does he expect his husband to feed all those babies on that salary? And you know with all those kids the Lord of Lords can't work. That means hardworking taxpayers' money has to go for Christ's food stamps!
He needs to get fixed.

The Lord is a crazy man - paranoid schizophrenic. If he doesn't take his medication, he walks up and down the street, cussing and spitting on everybody he passes. He's homeless. Nobody knows where his family is - if he's got one. Digs out of the trash cans for food. Somebody ought to get him off the street.
Jesus is nothing but a nuisance.

I'm starting to see the Son of God everywhere I go. He's always crying or begging or looking pitiful. Why doesn't he pull himself up by his bootstraps? This is America! Makes me mad. He's ruining our neighborhood.
Somebody ought to do something about him.
Somebody.

Tags: Claudia Mair Burney, Will Samson, Lisa Samson, Justice in the Burbs, Jesus

Labels: social justice, theology

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 6:00 PM | Permalink | 1 comments
Sunday, October 21, 2007
Welcome to Monsantoland


If you've ever wondered who the "bad guys" are, the Monsanto Company, a multinational agricultural biotechnology corporation, would qualify. These are the folks who are creating and dumping all kinds of chemical toxins into our environment, as well as creating genetically modified crops that they alone hold the patents to, thereby forcing farmers to pay Monsanto year after year for their seed rather than being able to become self-sustaining. They are also known for putting heavy political pressure on the FDA to approve foods and chemicals that have not been sufficiently tested and are potentially harmful, as well as for pressuring news outlets not to run negative stories about Monsanto.

To read more about Monsanto's abuses click here or here.

Tags: Monsanto, Monsantoland, PCB's, Dioxin, Agent Orange

Labels: environment, social justice

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 4:46 PM | Permalink | 2 comments
Thursday, October 11, 2007
The Justice Creed
The Justice Creed

We believe that the living God is just
And that the true and living God loves justice.
God delights in just laws and rejoices in just people.
God sides with those who are oppressed by injustice,
And stands against oppressors.
God is grieved by unjust people and the unjust systems they create and sustain.
God blesses those who hunger and thirst for justice, and
God's kingdom belongs to those willing to be persecuted for the sake of justice.
To God, justice is a weighty thing which can never be ignored.


We believe that Jesus, the Liberating King, came to free humanity from injustice
And to display the justice of God,
In word and deed, in life, death, and resurrection.
The justice which God desires, Jesus taught, must surpass that of the hypocrites,
For the justice of God is a compassionate justice,
Rich in mercy and abounding in love
For the last, the least, the lost, and the outcast.
On his cross, Jesus drew the injustice of humanity into the light,
And there the heartless injustice of human empire met
The reconciling justice of the kingdom of God.
The resurrection of Jesus proclaims that the true justice of God,
Naked, vulnerable, and scarred by abuse, is stronger
Than the violent injustice of humanity, armed with weapons, conceit, deceit, and lies.


We believe that the Holy Spirit is here, now,
Convicting the world of sin and justice,
Warning that God's judgment will come on all that is unjust.
We believe that the Kingdom of God is justice, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit.
Empowered by the Spirit, then, we seek first God's kingdom and God's justice,
For the world as it is has not yet become the world as God desires it to be.
And so we live, and work, and pray,
Until justice rolls down like water,
And flows strong and free like a never-failing stream.
For we believe that the living God is just
And that the true and living God loves justice.
Amen.

by Brian McLaren
Tags: justice, Brian McLaren, God

Labels: social justice, theology

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 5:54 PM | Permalink | 4 comments
Layout design by Pannasmontata Header image © VladStudio