Monday, June 30, 2008
Farewell to Via Christus

Yesterday was the last Sunday gathering for our now-defunct church plant, Via Christus Community Church, here in Yorkville, Illinois. We've spent the past three years trying to build a self-sustaining faith community here on the furthest edges of Chicagoland, and while we did succeed in creating a wonderful house church, we simply never grew past that size to a point where Julie and I could draw a livable salary and continue the work here. Our decision to pull the plug now rather than stick it out a while longer was mainly due to the fact that a large percentage of our regular attenders have also moved out of the area this summer, and others are likely moving soon. Rather than start over from square one, we realized that it was time to move on to other things.

However, I don't at all feel like this has ultimately been a failure. I am proud of the community we created and the life transformations that have occurred as a result - not to mention the impact we've had on the wider Yorkville community. We have lived up to our mission of "transforming people to transform the world". And I'm especially pleased at the unique kind of church that we've created together. We set out to be a different kind of church, and we were. Something I wrote for the Visitors section of our website captures well what was unique about Via Christus:

When we say Via Christus is probably like no other church you’ve visited before, we’re not kidding. Imagine a church where it doesn’t matter how you dress, what you look like, how you talk, whether you know the right beliefs or even how to “behave” in church. Imagine a church where you get to be part of creating the “sermon” – asking questions and sharing stories. Imagine a church where “worship” involves way more than just singing – it involves art, and imagination, and contemplation, and movement, and creativity, and much more. Imagine a church where you don’t just sit and absorb, you are invited into the experience.

And most importantly, imagine a church that cares more about how it is going out into the world to serve others on a daily basis, than about how to draw people into a once-a-week religious service.

We are very experiential and participatory as a church. However, as a new visitor, we will never put you on the spot or make you feel uncomfortable. You are welcome to simply come and observe – there’s never any pressure to participate beyond what you’re comfortable with. We want you to get to know us at your own pace.

For those who wonder if we are “traditional” or “contemporary” – the answer is yes… and so much more as well. We try to appreciate and incorporate good elements from the whole buffet of spiritual practices that have been handed down through the centuries of the Christian faith. Whether it’s ancient or postmodern, contemplative or charismatic, hymns or praise songs – we will embrace whatever is helpful for drawing us closer to God and each other.

So what should you expect? Expect a church that is open to trying new things (and old things). Expect a church where you have the opportunity to not just sit and listen but to actively engage. Expect a church that is friendly, fun (even silly at times), and laid-back, and yet challenging at the same time. Our goal is to transform lives and the whole world with God’s love, so expect to be changed (for the better we hope) by your time with us.


This is what Via Christus was. It's going to be hard for us to find another community that will replace this.

Labels: ,

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 3:12 PM | Permalink | 5 comments
Friday, June 27, 2008
Another World is Possible
I just finished reading a trilogy by science fiction author Kim Stanley Robinson. The books (Forty Signs of Rain, Fifty Degrees Below Zero, and Sixty Days and Counting) are set in the very near future (2016 at the latest) and primarily deal with the catastrophic effects of global climate change and the efforts of scientists and politicians to finally do something about it. However, it might be more accurate to classify this series as fantasy rather than sci-fi in that it is primarily a political fantasy about what it would be like if a true Progressive, the likes of which we haven't seen since FDR, ever got elected President - a president that would fight both global warming and the suicidal tyranny of our current economic system.

Whether you consider this a utopian or dystopian fantasy would probably depend on your political leanings. Personally I found the possibility thrilling, if a little far-fetched (for instance, it takes a serious suspension of disbelief to believe that the Pentagon would ever allow any significant portion of its half-a-trillion dollar budget to be re-allocated towards climate change mitigation efforts). However, I confess that I did find myself resonating with the sense of possibility and hope that Robinson writes about. He places a little too much stock in the powers of science and human imagination in my opinion, however, I agree with him that we should at least try to imagine a different kind of world, rather than simply get sucked into the cynical mindset that things will never really change (or the Christian version of this, which I find both in conservative and progressive camps, which is that things will never really change until Christ's return)

In the third book the newly elected President Phil Chase starts his own blog "Cut to the Chase" (sort of a 21st Century version of FDR's Fireside Chats) and in one of the entries he addresses the importance of not letting ourselves get sucked into a cynical, fatalistic mindset. He writes:

I think for a while we forgot what was possible. Our way of life damaged our ability to imagine anything different. Maybe we are rarely good at imagining that things could be different...

"Through new uses of corporations, banks and securities, new machinery of industry, of labor and capital - all undreamed of by the Fathers - the whole structure of modern life was impressed into the service of economic royalists. It was natural and perhaps human that the privileged princes of these new economic dynasties, thirsting for power, reached out for control of government itself. They created a new despotism and wrapped it in the robes of legal sanction. In its service new mercenaries sought to regiment the people, their labor and their property. And as a result the average man once more confronts the problem that faced the Minute Man. For too many of us life was no longer free; liberty no longer real; men could no longer follow the pursuit of happiness. Against economic tyranny such as this, the American citizen could appeal only to the organized power of the Government."

That was Franklin Roosevelt, talking as president to the nation in 1936. In the same speech he said, "There is a mysterious cycle in human events. To some generations much is given. Of other generations much is expected . This generation of Americans has a rendezvous with destiny."

But then we forgot again. We went back to imagining that things could only ever be as they were. We lived on in that strange new feudalism, in ways that were unjust and destructive and yet were presented as the only possible reality. We said "people are like that," or "human nature will never change," or "we are all guilty of original sin," or "this is democracy, this is the free market, this is reality itself." And we went along with that analysis, and it became the law of the land. The entire world was legally bound to accept this feudal injustice as law. It was global and so it looked like it was universal. The future itself was bought, in the form of debts, mortgages, contracts - all spelled out by law and enforced by police and armies. Alternatives were unthinkable. Even to say things could be otherwise would get you immediately branded as unrealistic, foolish, naive, insane, utopian.

But that was all delusion. Every few years things change completely, even though we can't quite remember how it happened or what it means. Change is real and unavoidable. And we can organize our affairs any way we please. There is no physical restraint on us. We are free to act. It's a fearsome thing, this freedom, so much so that people talk about a "flight from freedom" - that we fly into cages and hide, because freedom is so profound it's a kind of abyss. To actually choose in each moment how to live is too scary to endure.

So we lived like sleepwalkers. But the world is not asleep, and outside our dream things continued to change. Trying to shape that change is not a bad thing. Some pretend that making a plan is instant communism and the devil's work, but it isn't so. We always have a plan. Free market economics is a plan - it plans to give over all decisions to the blind hand of the market. But the blind hand never picks up the check. And, you know - it's blind. To deal with the global environmental crisis we now face without making any more plan than to trust the market would be like saying, We have to solve this problem so first let's put out our eyes. Why? Why not use our eyes? Why not use our brain?

Because we're going to have to imagine our way out of this one.
Right on. Change is inevitable, so we can either sit by on the sidelines and let others shape it for their own greed and ambitions of power, or we can use our God-given abilities to try to shape it towards increased justice and love in the world. Will we create utopia (what Jesus called the Kingdom of God)? Probably not right away, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't try.

Labels:

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 8:00 PM | Permalink | 0 comments
Monday, June 23, 2008
I'm Voting Republican
They've convinced me...

Labels: ,

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 4:40 PM | Permalink | 3 comments
Thursday, June 19, 2008
Book Review: Jesus for President
I meant to post my review of Jesus for President, the new book by Shane Claiborne & Chris Haw, a few weeks ago, but I got distracted. Anyhow, it is, on many levels, a simply amazing book. Before even getting into the content and themes, I should say that the whole layout and design is a work of art (much of it by my friends Chico & Tatiana Fajardo-Heflin, Paul Soupiset and Holly & Ryan Sharp - you can click here for examples of a few pages.) I've literally never seen a book like this before. The images found on nearly every page are evocative and unusual and add to the total experience.

In the book Shane and Chris set out to show how the biblical narratives, from Genesis through revelation, are decidedly anti-imperial, and how we as followers of Jesus must likewise resist being co-opted by the imperial systems of our own day by pursuing a counter-movement of simplicity, generosity, self-sacrifice, non-violence, and radical love for others and for one's enemies. In this, it is nothing new for me, as these are themes that I've been pondering for the past year or so myself (though much credit for that should go to Shane's earlier book). However, this is the first place I've seen it laid out so systematically and accessibly. I agree with this basic premise, and I think Shane and Chris do a great job of weaving in biblical analysis with issues of contemporary relevance. For this alone (and for the amazing artwork) I highly recommend this book.

However, I have to admit that the whole way through something was nagging at me. While I agreed with 95% of what these guys were saying, I kept feeling like there was something I couldn't quite go along with in their approach. Eventually I determined that it came down to two things:

1) Their critique of empire and the systems of this world, and their suggested solution that we ought to withdraw (as much as possible) into the contrast community of the church, is too "either/or". At times it seemed as if they saw almost nothing good out in the world, and likewise perhaps had too high a view of the goodness of the Christian community (for instance their suggestion that Christians ought to reinstate the practice of excommunication, without really addressing how to keep this practice from quickly becoming abusive) - though to be fair, this either/or dichotomy was far more implicit than explicit throughout most of the book. Quite honestly, it reminded me too much of the separatism of the conservative, borderline fundamentalist, Christian sub-culture of my youth. While the fundamentalists recommend separation from the world to avoid being corrupted by sexual immorality and false doctrine, Shane and Chris' neo-anabaptism recommends separating from it to avoid being corrupted by materialism, violence, and power.

But while I might resonate more with Shane and Chris' concerns than those of conservatives, I've still found the doctrine of separation itself to be flawed. What I eventually discovered when I was a conservative separatist was that "the world" is not always as bad as it it made out to be - that there is much truth and beauty and goodness even among non-believers. God is still at work, even outside the walls of the church. Likewise, I suspect that God is similarly at work for goodness and justice, even among the structures of empire. I guess what I found lacking in this book was a sense that God can work redemptively, not just outside of and in spite of the empire, but even sometimes in it and through it.

2) I also agree with Zack Exley's critique that this neo-monastic/neo-anabaptist movement of which Shane and Chris are stereotypical is in danger of "making an idol out of smallness and slowness". The book highlighted many fantastic stories of lone individuals or small groups of people living counter-culturally to the empire, and I am all about celebrating such stories. However, this were the only examples that were given, and I was left wondering "But, if all we ever engage in are these small, symbolic acts of resistance, are we ever really going to change anything?" and more importantly "What about justice for those who really are oppressed by the empire on a large scale?" I mean it's all well and good for the privileged children of white suburbanites to decide they're going to sell all their possessions and live among the poor and oppressed, but I can't help but think that some of those poor and oppressed might prefer it if we used our power and wealth to help them out of their poverty and oppression.

Besides which, there are some injustices that simply cannot be dealt with on the small, local scale. The Jubilee Campaign is a perfect example. International debt relief for impoverished nations can be advocated for by individuals and communities, but ultimately it has to be enacted on the national and international levels. Similar arguments can be made regarding the enormity of problems like the AIDS epidemic, global climate change, and extreme poverty, just to name a few. Something can and should be done about these problems, but they will not get done if we only ever insist on doing things small and apart from the existing structures of power and wealth. If we insist on maintaining our own self-righteous "purity" from the empire, we will be guilty of neglecting justice.

However, these critiques should not be taken to mean that I didn't appreciate and enjoy the book. There is still much here of value; and even these areas of disagreements are useful in provoking thought and conversation. In the end Claiborne/Haw and I agree that the way of Jesus - not the way of Caesar, or America, or Wall Street, etc. - ought to be our sole guide to how we live and act in the world. However, we perhaps disagree on the scale of those actions, and on whether it is possible to actually practice the way of Christ in midst of Wall Street or Washington or wherever.

Labels: , , ,

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 9:04 PM | Permalink | 7 comments
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
A Little Mastermind

With his fingers intertwined like this and the look on his face, I can't help but think he looks like some evil mastermind - like he's saying "I have you now Mr. Bond!" :)

Julie has posted more about Aidan at our Baby Blog. First there is the Birth Story. Then, if you're interested, she posted about why we chose the names we did (both for him and for Emma). Regarding Aidan's middle name, Elessar, here is what she said:

With Aidan we went with another Lord of the Rings middle name. If you didn't know, Elessar is Aragorn's elvish name (he was raised by the elves) and the name he assumes once he becomes King. The term elessar actually refers to a green jewel (in a ring of course) that contains a bit of a star (making it apropos to pair with Aidan). But the person who has the right to wear the stone is also referred to as the elessar - a person who is a healer. In LOTR Aragorn shows that he is a healer as well as a leader and King. But the idea behind this type of healer is not just one who can heal physical wounds, but one who can look at any person or situation and see the good underneath. The healing occurs by the elessar being able to bring forth the inherent good in people and in the world. I loved that concept and pray that my child can be one of those who see that "there's good in this world and it's worth fighting for." (and yes, we are complete nerds as well...).

I also really like this picture, taken on Father's Day, with me and my two kids.

Labels: ,

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 7:33 PM | Permalink | 0 comments
Friday, June 13, 2008
St. Aidan's Prayer
St. Aidan's Prayer for the Holy Island of Lindisfarne

Lord, this bare island,
make it a place of peace.

Here be the peace of those who do Thy will.

Here be the peace of brother and sister serving man.
Here be the peace of holy friends obeying.
Here be the peace of praise by dark and day.
Be this Island Thy Holy Island.

I, Lord, Thy servant, Aidan, make this prayer.
Be it Thy care.
Amen.

Labels:

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 12:22 PM | Permalink | 1 comments
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Welcome to the World!
Julie gave birth yesterday (via an emergency C-section) to our son, Aidan Elessar Clawson. He was 8 pounds, 1 oz and 20 inches long and is very healthy.





Labels: ,

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 11:22 AM | Permalink | 11 comments
Monday, June 09, 2008
Went to the hospital last night...
But not for the reason you think. No Julie hasn't given birth yet. (Though she's been having nearly constant false labor contractions for the past week.) Last night we had to go to the ER for Emma. She had been running a fever all afternoon and evening yesterday, and after we put her to bed she started complaining about a pain in her right side. Thinking appendicitis, we decided to take her to the hospital, where we spent the next three hours as they did all kinds of tests. (Emma wasn't a big fan of having her blood drawn.) They didn't find anything seriously wrong, so they sent us home around 2:30am. Fun times...

Hopefully we'll be back there in a few days for other reasons. :)

Labels:

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 4:29 PM | Permalink | 0 comments
Truth in Advertising
This sign was at a local gas station in Oswego, IL:

At least they're honest. :)

Labels:

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 4:27 PM | Permalink | 1 comments
Thursday, June 05, 2008
A view from the front lines
From Shane Claiborne and Chris Haw's new book, Jesus for President:

The other night a soldier called us on the phone (not that unusual these days). He said that he and his friend had just gotten back from Iraq, where a bunch of folks were passing around a copy of the book The Irresistible Revolution. His friend had been in a shooting conflict with some Iraqis, and he shot an older man. Now this twenty-year-old American soldier was having a hard time sleeping. But it wasn't the fact that he had killed the man that was keeping him up at night. It was the face of the man's son, a twelve-year-old boy, who had run out of the house, grabbed his dead father's gun, and started shooting at the US soldiers. So the soldier's friend shot the boy too.

What else could he have done? The soldier said it's absolutely maddening; people feel like they are turning into animals. And every time they point a gun in some young kid's face, they feel they're creating a terrorist. He said that our guns and wars are not making the world safer.

Labels: , ,

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 5:51 PM | Permalink | 4 comments
Tuesday, June 03, 2008
Finally!
I'm relieved that Obama finally has enough delegates to clinch the Democratic nomination. He's not a perfect candidate, but I have a lot of reasons that I do like him and I'm happy he got it. It's interesting, but in this long drawn out primary season I've come to have even more respect for Barack Obama, despite all the mud Hillary threw at him, and at the same time less and less respect for the Democratic Party as a whole (not to mention almost no respect left for Hillary Clinton). I mean, how many ways can the Democrats go out of their way to hurt their chances in the general election? They're really their own worst enemies. If we're subjected to a third Bush term (aka a McCain presidency), the Dems will have no one to blame but themselves.

Labels:

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 10:38 PM | Permalink | 0 comments
Monday, June 02, 2008
Prince Caspian
WARNING SPOILERS AHEAD!!!


I'm a little late with this review, but a few weeks ago Julie and I got to go see Prince Caspian. I've always loved the Narnia books, and as a kid Caspian was one of my favorites (I think I've always just had a thing for stories about out-numbered, underground resistance movements). Going into the movie I had heard that it didn't stick too closely to the book (which I could already tell from the trailers), and that turned out to be true. However, I've never been a purist when it comes to movie adaptations, even of books that I love - whether Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, or now Narnia. I think it's far more important to capture the spirit of the book and to reshape it into a story that will still be compelling when translated onto the very different medium of film. Peter Jackson accomplished that exceptionally with LOTR; Chris Columbus did less well with the first two Potter films, though the more recent ones have been better; and I was even slightly disappointed with the first Narnia movie. However, this one, in my opinion, was excellently done. The writers, producers and directors took a very linear, straightforward plot from the book and gave it enough twists, turns, and suspense to make it enjoyable for a screen audience. It's a different story in some ways, but as it's own story, it's pretty good.

Some of the changes they made which I particularly liked included:
  • Portraying the Pevensies as bitter and slightly angry about being back in their world after their time in Narnia. Let's face it, if you had lived your half a life in a place where you were kings and queens and had friends and a home, and then suddenly, without warning, it was all taken away and you had to do adolescence all over again, wouldn't you be just a tad upset?
  • Spending more time on the behind-the-scenes politics and intrigues of Miraz's court.
  • Intensifying the clash of authority between Peter and Caspian (too many kings in the kitchen) and adding a sequence about a failed raid on Miraz's castle planned by Peter. I thought it was a believable twist, added to the drama of the story, and heightened the sense of desperation among Caspian's followers.
  • Showing, rather than merely telling about summoning the White Witch. You really get a sense of the seductive power of evil.
  • Adding a bit of romance between Caspian & Susan. Even though Lewis would have never gone there, in the context of the movie it's totally believable (especially since Caspian is played by tall, dark and handsome actor with a Spanish accent).
  • Leaving out Aslan's romp through Narnia with Bacchus. It's fun in the book, but would have made no sense at all in the movie.

That said, one thing I didn't like in the movie, and this is actually a flaw in the book too, is the literal deus ex machina ending (same problem in the first book too). In both Aslan literally roars in to save the day, despite him telling Lucy that he wasn't going to do that ("Nothing happens the same way twice, little one.") I know Lewis probably had some theological point to make with this, but in a story, it's a bit cheap. If the god-like figure was going to step in and fix everything instantly anyway, then when didn't he do so sooner and save everyone a lot of trouble. (Actually, that's not a bad theological question either, and how you answer it will make a big difference for your eschatology.)

Anyhow, overall it was a fun movie and a good adaptation. I'm glad we were able to find time before the baby comes to go see it on the big screen.

Labels: ,

 
posted by Mike Clawson at 3:10 PM | Permalink | 7 comments